Respected Sir,
Before writing anything I would like to make declaration that I am not constitution expert or political strategist. As I have said in one of my previous letters, I am “common man of India”; the AAM AADAMI of your very own party.
Sir I am provoked to write to you due to some unauthorized unauthenticated unconfirmed leaked mails. I have certain doubts. I request you to clear them. I expect you will do the needful because being PM of India you are answerable to common man.
We people of India do not know the technicalities of investigation. JPC constituted to probe this matter, could not explain the source of 3 crore Rs brought in the parliament. 3 crore might be small amount for your colleagues in parliament, but it is very big amount for 99.99% of Indians. Sir, you and your party is stressing that this committee gave clean chit to accused people. But sir if you go into details of this committee, this decision was taken with 4-3 majority in the committee. It means that 3 people felt that everything was not clear. Secondly sir committee was constituted of MPs who are not an expert. Thirdly this committee recommended further investigation of this matter by expert authorities. Now sir can tell us what happened to third recommendation??? What was source of money brought inside Lok Sabha???
Sir I want you to do an objective analysis using common sense of this wikibomb. In past also govt of US had not refused the authenticity of these cables. It implies that these are true conversations not fabricated either by The Hindu or Julian Assange and company. Now sir coming to next step-diplomat of US conveyed that information to his government. US badly wanted the deal to go through so that their companies could get investment opportunities in largest energy market of the world. Therefore US was keeping close eye over the issue of trust vote. To my common sense it seems to be beyond logic that a diplomat would convey false information over such critical issue. Then we can conclude that words in leaked cables are true. Isn’t it your duty to clarify on this issue without technical jargons to your countrymen who stood by you in 2009 election?
Now sir I listened your statement in parliament. It was very much correct politically but it lacked common sense. It was full of arrogance that your party was re-elected. I need not to tell you voting pattern in India. I am from Maharashtra, and I can tell you that victory of congress was not due to “good governance”; but you should be thankful to MNS who contributed to defeat of opposition. Similarly there were many non-relevant issues like caste, regional issues etc. during elections which contributed to the victory. People of India are very innocent and they have short memory. Sir I bet if an effective opposition can capitalize the poor governance, inflation and corruption effectively then no sense voter will ever for this government.
Sir, I am sorry if I have been too harsh but this is harsh reality of India.
