BJP is a political party and it is politically correct about its ekta yaatra; may not be so correct ethically. Congress government has also tried its best to capitalize on this yatra. It seems that congress purposely publicized this by its overwhelming opposition. Congress seems to be in better position politically. If it succeeds then it will get the credit of maintaining law and order; and if it fails then also it will blame bjp for it and get away with its experience in politics.
As far as issue of hoisting tricolor at lalchowk is concerned, by opposing it on the basis of disturbance of law and order we will give message that we accept kashmir is a disputed area, which we have not done in last 63 years. It will again boost morale of separatists, sitting in India and across the border.
If on the contrary congress would have allowed this to happen the situation would have been much better. First this issue would not have got too much media coverage and any outrage if at all provoked would have been easily manageable. Secondly by preventing outrage and violence we would have given message that Kashmir is integral part of India, and kashmiris accept it.
I would like to attract attention towards his reference of "new delhi" and "kashmir". I would request intelligentsia of this country that please try to avoid such references. It sends poor message, magnifies feelings of separatism.
I am sure, not many kashmiris favor its accession to pakistan, what they want is minimal interference of army (i would request media not to use phrase INDIAN ARMY). It is two way process. 100% demilitarization is not possible as it is border state. Yeah we need to take steps to minimize impact of militarization on day to day life of common kashmiris. If people of kashmir want more autonomy and less interference of army then also there is no reason that a flag hoisting should provoke outrage. It is possible only separatists are quantitatively more. If it is so then it is not good sign. We should concentrate on curbing separatists feelings by social development and progress. I would like to repeat that opposing flag hoisting will do nothing better than boosting morale of separatists.
Monday, January 24, 2011
Flag hoisting at Lal Chowk
BJP is a political party and it is politically correct about its ekta yaatra; may not be so correct ethically. Congress government has also tried its best to capitalize on this yatra. It seems that congress purposely publicized this by its overwhelming opposition. Congress seems to be in better position politically. If it succeeds then it will get the credit of maintaining law and order; and if it fails then also it will blame bjp for it and get away with its experience in politics.
As far as issue of hoisting tricolor at lalchowk is concerned, by opposing it on the basis of disturbance of law and order we will give message that we accept kashmir is a disputed area, which we have not done in last 63 years. It will again boost morale of separatists, sitting in India and across the border.
If on the contrary congress would have allowed this to happen the situation would have been much better. First this issue would not have got too much media coverage and any outrage if at all provoked would have been easily manageable. Secondly by preventing outrage and violence we would have given message that Kashmir is integral part of India, and kashmiris accept it.
I would like to attract attention towards his reference of "new delhi" and "kashmir". I would request intelligentsia of this country that please try to avoid such references. It sends poor message, magnifies feelings of separatism.
I am sure, not many kashmiris favor its accession to pakistan, what they want is minimal interference of army (i would request media not to use phrase INDIAN ARMY). It is two way process. 100% demilitarization is not possible as it is border state. Yeah we need to take steps to minimize impact of militarization on day to day life of common kashmiris. If people of kashmir want more autonomy and less interference of army then also there is no reason that a flag hoisting should provoke outrage. It is possible only separatists are quantitatively more. If it is so then it is not good sign. We should concentrate on curbing separatists feelings by social development and progress. I would like to repeat that opposing flag hoisting will do nothing better than boosting morale of separatists.
As far as issue of hoisting tricolor at lalchowk is concerned, by opposing it on the basis of disturbance of law and order we will give message that we accept kashmir is a disputed area, which we have not done in last 63 years. It will again boost morale of separatists, sitting in India and across the border.
If on the contrary congress would have allowed this to happen the situation would have been much better. First this issue would not have got too much media coverage and any outrage if at all provoked would have been easily manageable. Secondly by preventing outrage and violence we would have given message that Kashmir is integral part of India, and kashmiris accept it.
I would like to attract attention towards his reference of "new delhi" and "kashmir". I would request intelligentsia of this country that please try to avoid such references. It sends poor message, magnifies feelings of separatism.
I am sure, not many kashmiris favor its accession to pakistan, what they want is minimal interference of army (i would request media not to use phrase INDIAN ARMY). It is two way process. 100% demilitarization is not possible as it is border state. Yeah we need to take steps to minimize impact of militarization on day to day life of common kashmiris. If people of kashmir want more autonomy and less interference of army then also there is no reason that a flag hoisting should provoke outrage. It is possible only separatists are quantitatively more. If it is so then it is not good sign. We should concentrate on curbing separatists feelings by social development and progress. I would like to repeat that opposing flag hoisting will do nothing better than boosting morale of separatists.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
just think over it..
hi frnds,
m here with another analyzed fact which is paradoxical to my personal thinking. M great fan of cricket and some cricketers; but after giving due consideration to their success rate, contribution towards society and remunerations i feel there exist great disproportion as compared to other fields. many arguments and counterarguments can be given to glorify glamor world and one's personal likings but no one can deny above fact.
just take example of one of the greatest batsman-
total ODIs played-444
Let's we take at least 30 (1/10 of 300 runs) runs as bench mark for success in an inning. The above stats says that this player has been dismissed for 209 times with score of less than 30 runs. It makes roughly 47% of all his innings. Statistically we can say that 47% of times the said player has failed to deliver.
now let's compare with other professionals..-
A surgeon failing to save 47% of his patients would be one of the worst among his contemporaries;
A physician misdiagnosing and failing to cure 47% of his patients should make bonfire of his degrees;
a architect who designs 100 buildings and bridges out of which 47 collapses then he should be behind bars under S.304A of IPC;
A teacher, whose 47% of students fail will struggle to stay in the profession and will starve to death;
a software engineer whose 47% of programs fail to run will be responsible for bankruptcy of his company;
.
.
.
.
and so on.
now in terms of contribution towards well-being of society others do a lot better. these are statistics of the best player, cant think about comparing mediocre and worst. now this can be applied to other fields also...just analyze yourselves; what is success rate of people whom we glorify with others around us...i know not many will like this article...many will label it as my frustration of not being among those glorified personalities..but whatever...a fact will always remain fact...lastly an appeal..."think before you make some one rich on cost of yourself...hope that message is clear.."
thanks a lot if u have shown patience to read this article...and also if u implement it in your lives...
m here with another analyzed fact which is paradoxical to my personal thinking. M great fan of cricket and some cricketers; but after giving due consideration to their success rate, contribution towards society and remunerations i feel there exist great disproportion as compared to other fields. many arguments and counterarguments can be given to glorify glamor world and one's personal likings but no one can deny above fact.
just take example of one of the greatest batsman-
total ODIs played-444
| 0 runs | 20 | ||||||||||||
| 1-9 runs | 98 | ||||||||||||
| 10-19 runs | 53 | ||||||||||||
| 20-29 runs | 38 | ||||||||||||
| 30-39 runs | 44 | ||||||||||||
| 40-49 runs | 29 | ||||||||||||
| 50-89 runs | 62 | ||||||||||||
| 90-99 runs | 17 | ||||||||||||
| 150-199 runs | 2 |
Let's we take at least 30 (1/10 of 300 runs) runs as bench mark for success in an inning. The above stats says that this player has been dismissed for 209 times with score of less than 30 runs. It makes roughly 47% of all his innings. Statistically we can say that 47% of times the said player has failed to deliver.
now let's compare with other professionals..-
A surgeon failing to save 47% of his patients would be one of the worst among his contemporaries;
A physician misdiagnosing and failing to cure 47% of his patients should make bonfire of his degrees;
a architect who designs 100 buildings and bridges out of which 47 collapses then he should be behind bars under S.304A of IPC;
A teacher, whose 47% of students fail will struggle to stay in the profession and will starve to death;
a software engineer whose 47% of programs fail to run will be responsible for bankruptcy of his company;
.
.
.
.
and so on.
now in terms of contribution towards well-being of society others do a lot better. these are statistics of the best player, cant think about comparing mediocre and worst. now this can be applied to other fields also...just analyze yourselves; what is success rate of people whom we glorify with others around us...i know not many will like this article...many will label it as my frustration of not being among those glorified personalities..but whatever...a fact will always remain fact...lastly an appeal..."think before you make some one rich on cost of yourself...hope that message is clear.."
thanks a lot if u have shown patience to read this article...and also if u implement it in your lives...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)